Case study · dermatology · mumbai

How a Mumbai acne-scar clinic stopped its Meta ads getting rejected — and tripled qualified enquiries

The clinic’s before/after acne-scar creative kept getting rejected by Meta, so it fell back on weak, generic ads. The audit found a compliant creative path the clinic never knew existed — plus an authority gap that was suppressing conversion.

31% → 4%
Ad rejection rate
across the first 60 days post-audit
Qualified enquiries
month-on-month within the quarter
−41%
Cost per qualified enquiry
as compliant creative scaled

The situation

An aesthetic dermatology clinic in Mumbai — strong on acne-scar revision, laser resurfacing and pigmentation — had a frustrating, recurring problem. Their most persuasive marketing asset was their before/after work, and every time they tried to advertise it on Meta, the ads were rejected. After months of this, the clinic had quietly given up on showing results at all and fallen back on generic “book a consultation” creative that performed poorly.

By the time they applied for the audit, the owner had concluded that “Meta just doesn’t allow dermatology before/afters” — and was considering abandoning the channel that should have been their strongest.

What the audit found

The creative wasn’t the problem — the framing was

Meta does restrict before/after content that implies negative self-perception or uses the classic side-by-side “ugly-to-pretty” framing. The clinic’s ads were tripping exactly those rules. But the audit benchmarked three competitor clinics that were successfully running results-led creative — and they were using compliant formats the clinic had never tried: process-led video, single-state “healed skin” imagery with the journey told in copy, and patient-voice testimonial cuts. The path existed; the clinic just hadn’t found it.

An authority gap underneath the ads

Even when ads did get through, the clinic’s Instagram — the first place a Mumbai patient checks after seeing an ad for something as personal as facial scarring — had almost no doctor-led authority content. Patients arrived from the ad, found a thin profile, and didn’t enquire. The audit estimated this was costing 35–50 qualified enquiries a month at their existing ad spend.

Tracking couldn’t see qualified enquiries

Their conversion event fired on form-load, so the clinic had no real view of which creative produced patients versus clicks — which is why the weak generic ads had survived as long as they had.

What we changed

The clinic engaged us on a retainer following the audit. We:

What happened next

Over the following quarter:

The clinic’s before/after work — the asset they’d nearly abandoned — became the centre of their best-performing campaigns, told in a way the platform allows.

Wondering whether your best creative is being held back by how it’s framed?

₹12,500 · payable after a 10-min walkthrough call · credited if you join us on a retainer

The Patient Flow Audit
₹12,500 · No payment to apply
Apply →